Legal Opinion

Wright v. Lee

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1943No. 6577PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is here on a second appeal. Both appeals are from the order of the District Court dismissing plaintiff's complaint for failure to file a bond as security for costs and attorney's fees, on motion of defendants Lee, Rogers and Randall. The allegations of the amended complaint are the same as those involved in the former appeal. The dismissal is based upon Sec. 104-44-22, U.C.A. 1943. The allegations of the amended complaint and the section of the statute are quoted at length in the former opinion, 101 Utah 76, 118 P.2d 132.

Appellant presents four questions: (1) Failure of the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kiesel v. District Court of Sixth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Sevier CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Consolidated Wagon & MacHine Co. v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Piper v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wright v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zamora v. DraperUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Monson v. BoydIdaho Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API