Legal Opinion

Finn, Administratrix v. Veatch

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1965No. 43,934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF REHEARING

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, C. J.:

This is a rehearing. The original opinion was filed June 12, 1965. (See Finn, Administratrix v. Veatch, 195 Kan. 13, 403 P. 2d 189.)

A rehearing was granted, limited to the all-decisive question of whether the record disclosed valid service of summons upon appellant Veatch.

The foregoing question, while it was raised in the original hearing, was not covered in our initial opinion. Hence, it becomes our duty to correct our error in failing to do so. That, it may be stated, can only be accomplished by supplementing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Topeka v. United Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Standard Steel Works v. Crutcher-Rolfs-Cummings, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Merchants Credit Service, Inc. v. Chouteau County BankMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Branner v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Voelker v. Broadview Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. Quivira Square Development Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  2. State v. Marshall & Brown-Sidorowicz, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API