Legal Opinion
Harris v. Kinard
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 1982No. 80-1367PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This appeal presents for our determination the propriety of the trial court’s denial of a petition for support under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). 1 The petition, which sought support for appellant’s two minor children, Yolanda and LeVar, was first filed in Maryland and was subsequently certified and transmitted in accordance with the applicable provisions 2 of the URESA to the Family Division of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. The trial court dismissed with prejudice the paternity and support action on behalf of Yolanda as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Prager v. Smith Ex Rel. PragerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Cobbe Ex Rel. Cobbe v. CobbeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Edmonds v. EdmondsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Jackson v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Schlecht v. SchlechtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mims v. MimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- District of Columbia Ex Rel. W.J.D. v. E.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Kammerman v. KammermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Edwards v. LateefDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Padgett v. PadgettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.