Legal Opinion

Bannister v. Pearce

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 4, 2025No. 7:22-cv-00091Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION AT PIKEVILLE CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-91-DLB-EBA BRANDON BANNISTER PLAINTIFF v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KEVIN C. PEARCE, JR., et al. DEFENDANTS ***************** I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendant the United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. (Doc. # 71). Brandon Bannister (“Plaintiff”) has filed his Response (Doc. # 76), the United States filed its Reply (Doc. # 78), and this matter is now ripe for review. For the following reasons, the United States’ Motion…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API