Legal Opinion
(PC) Nuno v. Eslick
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 7, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00769Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 GUILLERMO NUNO, No. 1:21-cv-00769-KES-SAB (PC) 13 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING 14 v. MOTION TO COMPEL AS MOOT 15 D. ESLICK, et al. (ECF Nos. 81, 94) 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, filed February 16, 21 2024. 22 I. 23 RELEVANT HISTORY 24 This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s deliberate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- City of Pomona v. Sqm North America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Robert Henry Nicolaus, Real-Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.