Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Cunningham v. Mathues

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 13, 1930No. 3857PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

After the opinion of this court was filed, 33 F.(2d) 261, the case of Barry v. United States ex rel. Cunningham, 279 U. S. 597, 49 S. Ct. 452, 454, 73 L. Ed. 867, was decided. Thereupon the government, conceiving that our decision was at variance with the holdings of the Supreme Court in that case, moved a rehearing be had. The motion was granted, and such rehearing was given. On due consideration the members of the court adhere to their views already expressed in the opinion and the dissent heretofore filed. We therefore confine the present opinion to a brief…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barry v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. United States ex rel. Cunningham v. MathuesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Emspak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  2. Emspak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API