Legal Opinion

Emspak v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 13, 1953No. 10943_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

203 F.2d 54

EMSPAK

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 10943.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued October 5, 1951.

Reargued May 27, 1952.

Decided December 19, 1952.

Petition for Rehearing Denied April 13, 1953.

David Scribner, New York City, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Allan Rosenberg, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Charles B. Murray, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at the time of argument, with whom George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., at the time the brief was filed, was on the brief, for appellee. Charles M. Irelan, U.…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Fahy; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bazelon.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API