Legal Opinion
BLAIR v. RICHARDSON
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 20, 2016No. 112,535PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.:
¶ 1 The two dispositive questions presented are whether: 1) the enactment of 43A O.S, 1986 § 1-105 1 reestablished the legal competency of an individual previously admitted to a mental health facility and presumed incompetent without a separate competency proceeding; and 2) the conveyance of her real property was void as a result of undue influence. 2 We hold that 43A O.S. 1986 § 1-105 reestablished the legal competency of the individual conveying the property, and that the deed was not executed under undue influence.
FACTS
¶ 2 Plaintiff/Appellant Pat Blair (Blair) and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Starkey v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ACCIDENT CARE AND TREATMENT CENTER v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
- BLAIR v. RICHARDSONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016