Legal Opinion

Home Indemnity Co. v. Matkin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1935No. 25847PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPi-Ielps, J.

On June 5, 1931, the State Industrial Commission entered an award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act in favor of an injured employee, B. M. Mat-kin, and against the employer, Patrick & Tillman, and insurance carrier, Southern Surety Company. The Southern Surety Company and Patrick & Tillman then instituted an original proceeding in this court to review said award, and, as required by section 13363, 0. S. 1931, as a condition precedent to the filing of said proceeding, executed a supersedeas bond wherein the Southern Surety Company was principal and the Home Indemnity Company of New York was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Patrick & Tillman v. MatkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. DunganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API