Massey v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COBB, Judge.
Appellant filed a Rule 3.850 motion alleging that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive habitual felony offender sentences for offenses arising from a single criminal episode. Appellant was sentenced in 1990 and his sentences were affirmed on direct appeal. See Massey v. State, 589 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA1991), approved, 609 So.2d 598 (Fla.1992). However, in 1993, the Florida Supreme Court held in Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994), that consecutive habitual offender sentences could not be imposed for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ayres v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Sims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996