Legal Opinion

Sims v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 1996No. 96-352Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The defendant appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The defendant’s claims are without merit, save one. The defendant alleges he was given improper consecutive enhanced habitual offender sentences in three separate cases. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Panda v. State, 647 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). See also, Benjamin v. State, 667 So.2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

The record reflects that consecutive habitual offender…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Benjamin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Gentry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Massey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API