Sims v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
The defendant appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The defendant’s claims are without merit, save one. The defendant alleges he was given improper consecutive enhanced habitual offender sentences in three separate cases. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Panda v. State, 647 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). See also, Benjamin v. State, 667 So.2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
The record reflects that consecutive habitual offender…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Benjamin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Gentry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Massey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995