Legal Opinion

Village of Pleasant City v. Division of Reclamation

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1993No. 92-1102PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This case presents two issues: First, whether R.C. 1513.073(A)(2) requires the Chief of the Division of Reclamation and Reclamation Board of Review to consider the effect that mining could have on the water supply, aquifer and the aquifer recharge area not based solely on the level of current usage and, second, whether the court of appeals used the proper standard of review in reversing the finding of the Reclamation Board of Review and ordering that Pleasant City’s entire petition area be designated unsuitable for mining. For the reasons stated below, we hold that the Reclamation Board of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Spires v. Div. of Mineral Resources Mgt., 06 Be 54 (9-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Buckeye Forest Council, Inc. v. Division of Mineral Resources ManagementOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Greenbelt Advocates v. Division of Mineral Resources ManagementOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Murray Energy Corp. v. Div. of Mineral Resources Mgt.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API