Kasmer v. Sternal
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff (appellee) on the verdict of a jury in a case of alleged malpractice. In our view the decision turns upon the question whether the jury were correctly instructed, and that question, we think, must be answered in the negative.
The facts, considered from the viewpoint most favorable to the plaintiff, are as follows :
Plaintiff, a former employee of the Government, is approximately seventy years of age. He has been in more or less delicate health since 1942 and has been wearing false teeth, including an upper and a partial lower denture, for the past…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Falco's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ceco Corp. v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Washington Hospital Center v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Rodgers v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Anna May Wood v. Rocky Alan Day and Giant Food, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Patricia Ann Milone v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.