Steele v. Security Benefit Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McFarland, J.:
Plaintiff-appellant Vernon L. Steele contends the district court erred in denying his motion for class action certification and in dismissing the case in its entirety. We do not agree.
In 1958, Steele purchased a $3,000 endowment insurance policy from defendant Security Benefit Life Insurance Company (hereinafter SBL). A like policy in the amount of $1,000 was purchased by Steele from SBL in 1966.
Each policy provided that upon default the policy owner had 60 days (90 days by company practice) to select one of three nonforfeiture provisions:
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. LikinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Vun Cannon v. BreedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Beaver v. ChaffeeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Connolly v. FrobeniusCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
3Cited by11 opinions
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- In re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Critchfield Physical Therapy v. Taranto Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Waltrip v. Sidwell Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.