Legal Opinion

G & G Langenbrunner, Inc. v. Davis Construction Co.

Hamilton County Municipal Court

Decided November 16, 1984No. 84CV-13113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeckwith, J.

Facts(1)Plaintiff, G & G Langenbrun-ner, Inc. (hereinafter “G & G”), contracted with defendant, Davis Construction Co. (hereinafter “Davis”), to provide the labor and materials for a decorative stone veneer wall and chimney at premises owned by defendants, James C. and Karen Matacía (hereinafter “Ma-tacias”).(2) An initial bid of $4,300 for the job was submitted by G & G. However, Davis had erroneously requested a bid for brick work and not stone as required by the Matacias.(3) A second bid for stone work was submitted but the Matacias found the color of the fieldstone unacceptable when laid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guldberg v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Janell, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Kazmier v. ThomOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Reliance Universal, Inc. v. Deluth Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams Carpet Contractors, Inc. v. SkellyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Banks v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API