Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Pullman Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 23, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The following is quoted from my opinion filed herein on November 22nd, 1948, 10 F.R.D. 77, 78.
“On November 19, 1948 the attorney for the defendants advised the Court that a motion was being brought in this Court to-dismiss the complaint as against the defendant, Pennsylvania Railroad Company, on the authority of Morrison v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company,1 Civil 36-653 (S.D.N.Y. 1946). A favorable decision on this motion might materially affect the determination of the present motion for a change of venue. The attorney for the defendants requests the Court to defer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Interstate Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Walsh v. Pullman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Lucas v. New York Cent. R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950