Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Engenious Designs LLC
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 6, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02548Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS WILLIAM G. GARDNER, III, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 21-2548-HLT-ADM ENGENIOUS DESIGNS LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs William G. Gardner, III, and Way Too Cool LLC bring this patent infringement action against defendant Engenious Designs LLC (“Engenious”). Before the court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave of Court to File the Amended Complaint. (ECF 11.) Plaintiffs seek leave to amend their complaint to correct the deficiencies in plaintiffs’ two previous complaints that the court found failed to state a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.