Legal Opinion

Adams v. Fry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 1, 1951No. 35014PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original action to require payment of claims for judicial salary in addition to that paid by the state as provided by chapter 10, 1947 S.L. 592, 74 O. S. Supp. §251b. The plaintiffs are the district judges of the 14th District Court Judicial District composed of Tulsa and Pawnee counties. The foregoing act provides additional payments of salary out of the court funds of said counties. The defendants in the action are the court clerks of the named counties.

Before the passage of the foregoing act provision was made by the Legislature for the payment of additional salaries to district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trustees', Executors' & Securities Ins. v. HootonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Patterson v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Kitchen v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  4. People v. Illinois Merchants Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. City of Midwest City v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API