State v. Oxford

In State v. Miller, 269 Or 328, 524 P2d 1399 (1974), the Oregon Supreme Court construed a Lane County Circuit Court rule that, unlike Uniform Trial Court Rule (UTCR) 4.060, required that any motion to suppress evidence be accompanied by an affidavit “setting forth all facts within [the defendant’s] knowledge upon which” the defendant intended to rely in support of the motion. See former Lane County Circuit Court (LCCC) Rule 7.015 (setting forth those requirements); Miller, 269 Or at 332-33 (quoting LCCC Rule 7.015). In holding that the trial court had erred in striking a motion to suppress…