People Ex Rel. Walton v. . Hicks
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 20, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action in the nature of quo warranta to test title to the office of health officer of the city of Amsterdam.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 20, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action in the nature of quo warranta to test title to the office of health officer of the city of Amsterdam. The relator was appointed health officer of the city of Amsterdam, without having passed the required civil service examination and took the oath of office. Thereafter he took and passed the required examination and was again appointed…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin; Crane and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Ginsberg v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Boisvert v. County of OntarioNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Comins v. County of DelawareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Staniszewski v. Lackawanna Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re YakelNew York Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.