Legal Opinion

In Re Scallon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1998No. SC S43201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a contested admission proceeding in which the Board of Bar Examiners (the BBX) finds itself in the unusual position of being unable to make a majority recommendation with respect to an application for admission to the Oregon State Bar (the Bar). The BBX consists of fourteen members. Seven members (the favoring half) believe that applicant Patrick John Scallon (applicant) should be admitted to practice in Oregon, albeit with conditions. Seven members of the BBX (the opposing half) believe that admission should be denied. Each half has offered articulate and cogent reasons for its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re RowellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re JaffeeOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Application of AlpertOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re MonacoOregon Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Reinstatement of GunterOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Admission to Practice Law: SteffenOregon Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API