Legal Opinion
Lindsey Labella, et al. v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 10, 2026No. 5:24-cv-07588Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LINDSEY LABELLA, et al., Case No. 24-cv-07588-NW 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 APPLE INC, Re: ECF No. 80 Defendant. 11 12 13 Plaintiffs seek relief for their purchases of Apple AirPods Pro Generation One Headphones 14 that Plaintiffs allege Apple knowingly sold with sound quality defects. Plaintiffs filed a second 15 amended complaint (“SAC”) on November 25, 2025. ECF No. 79. Apple now moves to dismiss 16 the SAC in part. Mot., ECF No. 80. Plaintiffs opposed, and Apple filed a reply. ECF Nos.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- D. Neubronner v. Michael R. MilkenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.