Legal Opinion
Finch v. City of Durham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 5, 1989No. 85PA89Published
1Opinion of the Court
384 S.E.2d 8 (1989)
325 N.C. 352
Vernon FINCH, Juaita Finch, Daniel J. Bullard and Christine Bullard
v.
The CITY OF DURHAM, North Carolina.
No. 85PA89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
October 5, 1989.
Mount White Hutson & Carden, P.A. by Richard M. Hutson, II, and Stephanie C. Powell, and Maxwell, Martin, Freeman and Beason, P.A. by James B. Maxwell, Durham, for plaintiff-appellees and cross-appellants.
Office of the City Atty. by Karen A. Sindelar, Asst. City Atty., Durham, for defendant-appellant and cross-appellee.
North Carolina League of Municipalities by S. Ellis Hankins, General Counsel, and…
Also in this document: Dissent · Exum; Concurrence; Dissent · Frye.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.