Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Flanagan

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 11, 2019No. 2:15-cv-00185Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Margaret Tinsley, et al., No. CV-15-00185-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Michael Faust, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 In 2016, Named Plaintiff B.K. (“Plaintiff” or “B.K.”), a minor in the custody of 16 the Arizona foster care system, sought certification of this matter as a class action with 17 subclasses under Rule 23(b)(2). This Court granted certification of the General Class, the 18 Non-Kinship Subclass, and the Medicaid Subclass. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the 19 certification of the General Class…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API