Legal Opinion
Anderson Co. v. Trico Products Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 31, 1964No. Civ. No. 5677PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, The Anderson Company (“Anco”) and Productive Inventions, Inc. (“Productive”), are Indiana corporations with a principal place of business in Gary, Indiana. Defendant, Trico Products Corporation (“Trico”), is a New York corporation doing business in Buffalo, New York.
The jurisdiction of this court is based upon the fact that this is a suit in equity arising under the patent laws of the United States. Jurisdiction over the parties is admitted or waived.
The controversy between the parties arises out of plaintiffs’ assertion that defendant has infringed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Anderson Company v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., and Zaiger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Berlenbach v. Anderson And Thompson Ski Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reich v. Reed Tool Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979