Legal Opinion · Dissent
Plotzki v. Standard Oil Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1950No. 28,638Published
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Gilkison, J.
I dissent from the majority opinion herein for the following reasons.
The fifth amended complaint is based upon the doctrine of “attractive nuisance” and omitting caption and signature, is as follows:
“Comes now the plaintiff by counsel and for her Fifth Amended Complaint alleges and says:
“1. That the plaintiff, Sophia A. Plotzki, was the mother of Donald William Plotzki, who at the time of his death as hereinafter alleged, was eleven (11) years of age; that, prior to his death, John ■Plotski, the father of said Donald William Plotzki, had deserted his family; that…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.