Legal Opinion · Dissent

Plotzki v. Standard Oil Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1950No. 28,638Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Gilkison, J.

I dissent from the majority opinion herein for the following reasons.

The fifth amended complaint is based upon the doctrine of “attractive nuisance” and omitting caption and signature, is as follows:

“Comes now the plaintiff by counsel and for her Fifth Amended Complaint alleges and says:
“1. That the plaintiff, Sophia A. Plotzki, was the mother of Donald William Plotzki, who at the time of his death as hereinafter alleged, was eleven (11) years of age; that, prior to his death, John ■Plotski, the father of said Donald William Plotzki, had deserted his family; that…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. City of Pekin v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API