Tommy Shaw v. Library of Congress
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Chief Judge:
A corollary to the doctrine of sovereign immunity exempts the United States from liability for interest absent its express consent thereto.1 The sole issue on this appeal is whether the District Court dishonored that precept when, in assessing an attorneys’ fee against the United States, it effected a 30 percent upward adjustment of the lodestar2 to compensate the attorney for delay in receipt of payment. ■
We sustain the adjustment alternatively on two grounds. First, we conclude that the language of the statute authorizing allowances of attorneys’…
2Cases cited95 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Masonry Masters, Inc. And Rigoberto Perdomo v. Alan C. Nelson and Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Unification Church v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Hall v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.