Legal Opinion

Lautum Realty Corp. v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 24, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDonnelly, J.

The action is brought to recover damages to plaintiff’s building by the alleged negligent blasting operations *732of the defendant during the course of its constmction of a sewer in the street adjacent to plaintiff’s property.

The pending motion is by plaintiff to examine defendant before trial on a number of items, among which is the method or methods used by defendant in connection with its shoring, blasting and dynamiting operations.

Section 288 of the Civil Practice Act provides: “ Any party to an action * * * may cause to be taken by deposition, before trial, his own testimony or that of any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Public National Bank v. National City BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. New York Telephone Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Schonhous v. WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Weiner v. J. I. Hass, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hardenbergh v. BothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API