Legal Opinion

Weiner v. J. I. Hass, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate was struck by an automobile owned by the corporate defendant and operated by the defendant Gersh, and died without regaining consciousness. The plaintiff-administratrix, asserting her lack of personal knowledge, and her inability to locate any witnesses to the accident, seeks an order for a general examination of the defendant Gersh who it is stated was the only eye witness to the occurrence. The answer interposed admits ownership, operation and control and denies the allegations of negligence on the part of the defendants.

There is no statutory bar to the granting of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Samley Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Buehler v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Middleton v. BoardmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Schonhous v. WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Davidson v. NewmanNew York Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tremblay v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Parsons v. MossNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lautum Realty Corp. v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1939
  4. Mulligan v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API