Legal Opinion

St. Francis Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Bowles

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 31, 1991No. 66,075PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.;

Plaintiff St. Francis Regional Medical Center, Inc., has pursued this action against Edward Bowles and his wife, Tamara Bowles, to collect its charges for medical services provided to Edward. All parties agree that the medical services provided to Edward were necessary services and that the hospital’s charges are reasonable and proper. Edward has confessed judgment in the principal amount of $12,021.54.

Because of Edward’s financial inability to pay, the hospital has sought identical but nonduplicative recovery against Tamara under the common-law doctrine of necessaries. The essence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. State v. KoontzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Harrington v. LoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Harrah v. HarrahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Chipp v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Francis Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. BowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API