Legal Opinion

Chipp v. Murray

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 2, 1963No. 43,044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action by a private detective against a divorced man for services performed under a contract independently made by the man s wife prior to the divorce. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition and appeal has been duly perfected.

The question presented is whether detective services for the wife were “necessaries” for which the husband is presumed to have pledged his credit.

On the 12th day of October, 1961, Virgil Chipp, d/b/a Confidential Investigation Bureau (appellant) filed an action .in the district court of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lanyon's Detective Agency, Inc. v. CochraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Gossett v. PattenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Murray v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guffy Ex Rel. Reeves v. GuffySupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. Rubin v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. In Re LakeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  4. St. Francis Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  5. Guffy Ex Rel. Reeves v. GuffySupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API