Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1971No. State 141PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

There are two basic issues on this appeal: (1) Were the out-of-court identifications a product of an illegal confrontation or one so suggestive as to deny Brown due process of law; and (2) were the in-court identifications the product of or tainted by an unconstitutional confrontation?

The law is clear that an in-court identification must not be the result of an exploitation of illegality or tainted by a violation of due process of law. In the trilogy of lineup cases, United States v. Wade (1967), 388 U. S. 218, 87 Sup. Ct. 1926, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1149; Gilbert v. California (1967), 388 U. S. 263,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. MarshallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. CheersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. HiblWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API