State v. Brown
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.
There are two basic issues on this appeal: (1) Were the out-of-court identifications a product of an illegal confrontation or one so suggestive as to deny Brown due process of law; and (2) were the in-court identifications the product of or tainted by an unconstitutional confrontation?
The law is clear that an in-court identification must not be the result of an exploitation of illegality or tainted by a violation of due process of law. In the trilogy of lineup cases, United States v. Wade (1967), 388 U. S. 218, 87 Sup. Ct. 1926, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1149; Gilbert v. California (1967), 388 U. S. 263,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MarshallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. CheersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HiblWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.