People v. Maxson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.
At issue here is whether the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Halbert v Michigan, 545 US 605; 125 S Ct 2582; 162 L Ed 2d 552 (2005), should be applied retroactively to cases in which a *387defendant’s conviction has become final. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for relief from judgment, and we conclude under federal and state law that Halbert should not be applied retroactively to cases in which a defendant’s conviction has become final.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 2001, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Kendrick ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- People of Michigan v. Raymond Curtis CarpMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. RaoMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. CarpMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.