Legal Opinion

Edna M. Smith and Noble Smith v. Uniroyal, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 9, 1970No. 17617_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Senior Circuit Judge.

In this diversity action, plaintiffs sought to recover for damages sustained in an automobile accident which allegedly resulted from a defective tire manufactured by defendant and placed on plaintiffs' automobile. The complaint contained three counts based upon negligence, breach of implied warranty and strict liability. The case was tried to a jury, and submitted on counts 2 and 3, count 1 having been dismissed during the trial. Defendant’s motions for a directed verdict made at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence and at the conclusion of all of the evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Shramek v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. State v. VAUGHAN ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Wojciuk v. United States Rubber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Diesbourg v. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Evelyn and Jack Lewy v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. v. Haven Hills Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Sidney Jones v. Counselor Hamelman, Sgt. Hampton, Officer Likens, and Officer SwainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API