Legal Opinion

Hare v. Chisman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1951No. 28,808PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.Draper,. C. J.

The appellee, Ethel M. Chisman, brought suit against the appellant, George Hare, and the appellee, Walter Hare, to partition certain real estate. George Hare answered in denial under Rule 1-3, and filed a cross-complaint alleging fee simple title in himself by adverse possession, and praying that his title be quieted. The appellee replied in denial and filed an additional paragraph alleging she was, a cotenant with the appellant. She later also pleaded the fifteen and twenty year statutes of limitation.

The trial court found that Ethel M. Chisman, Walter Hare and George Hare, as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lessee of Clymer v. DawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. King v. CarmichaelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Torrez v. BradyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Johnson v. PontiousIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Smith v. BorradaileNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Shutt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Piel v. DewittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Bennett v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Hagen v. HagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API