Legal Opinion

Royals v. Baggett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

G.S. 28-6 (b) provides: “Any person who renounces his right to qualify as administrator may at the same time nominate in writing some other qualified person to be named as administrator, and such designated person shall be entitled to the same priority of right to qualify as administrator as the person making the nomination. Provided, that the qualification of the appointee shall be within the discretion of the clerk of court.”

This Court, in Hill v. Alspaugh, 72 N.C. 402, said: “We think the true intent and meaning of the statute is that the persons primarily entitled to administration shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. . Alspaugh, Adm'r.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. Williams v. . NevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ragan v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API