Legal Opinion

Ragan v. Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 9, 1994No. 296PA93PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

In this appeal, plaintiffs contend that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that their personal injury action was barred because a claim was not presented to the personal representative of decedent’s estate within six months of decedent’s death. Plaintiffs further contend that defendant and plaintiffs’ underinsured motorist carrier are estopped from asserting this time bar as a defense because they did not raise the defense until twenty-two months after the complaint was filed and after representing during discovery that no such defense was present. We find it unnecessary to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brace v. StrotherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Royals v. BaggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pierce v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Dixon v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Braddy v. Nationwide Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Azalea Garden Board & Care, Inc. v. VanhoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Beach First National Bank v. Estate of GurnhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API