Legal Opinion
Morey v. State Ex Rel. Mothersead
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 7, 1928No. 17483PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
In the trial court, plaintiffs in error were defendants, and defendant in error was plaintiff. As they there thus appeared, they will here be so designated.
On December 1, 1925, plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendants under two causes of action; the first, on a promissory note of $2,500, with foreclosure of a mortgage on certain real property in the form of a deed; and the second, for certain interest on a prior mortgage indebtedness and certain taxes on the security covered by the mortgage in the first cause of action paid Dy plaintiff.
The case arose, as established by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Harn v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hughes v. TrahernIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Caldwell v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ward v. Oklahoma State Bank of AtokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roth v. Mercy Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Southern Surety Co. v. ManeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Wolcott, Receiver v. PierreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Louis Bulasky v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of San Francisco National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971