Legal Opinion
Kingsley v. Hawthorne Fabrics, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 17, 1964PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pkoctok, J.
Hawthorne Fabrics, Inc. (Hawthorne), a New Jersey corporation, is engaged in the business of processing, as well as jobbing, synthetic fabrics. Isaac Brawer and Matilda Brawer, his wife, are the holders of all the capital stock of Hawthorne. Brawer Bros. Silk Co. (Brawer), also a New Jersey corporation, is a jobber and dealer in synthetic yarns. Irving and Louis Brawer, brothers of Isaac Brawer, are the sole stockholders of Brawer. Heither Isaac nor Matilda Brawer has ever owned any Brawer stock, nor has Irving or Louis Brawer ever owned any…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. CalamaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Collins v. Northwest Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
- Dodge v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- GE Solid State, Inc v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce v. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Smith v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- In Re Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act RulesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.