Nieves v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KHOUZAM, Judge.
Angel Manuel Nieves appeals his judgment and sentence for second-degree murder. Nieves contends that the trial court committed fundamental error when it instructed the jury on the lesser-included offense of manslaughter by act because the standard instruction in effect at the time of and given at his trial improperly imposed the additional element of “intent to kill” to that offense. 1 In support of his contention, Nieves relies on Montgomery v. State, — So.3d - (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), review granted, 11 So.3d 943 (Fla.2009), in which the First District determined that the trial…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Standard Instruct. in Cr. Cases No. 2007-10Supreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Zeigler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3Cited by18 opinions
- Haygood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Richard O. Rambaran v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Salonko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Singh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Haygood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.