Higgons v. Pratt Institute
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Wo shall assume, as do the parties, that whether an eleemosynary institution is liable m tort to recipients of its charity is a question of local law, as to which the federal courts will follow state decisions. See Paterlini v. Memorial Hospital Ass’n, 247 F. 639, 641 (C. C. A. 3); Henry W. Putnam Memorial Hospital v. Allen, 34 F.(2d) 927, 929 (C. C. A. 2). The injury to plaintiff occurred in Brooklyn, and, under the above assumption, is to be determined according to the law of the state of New York.
The most recent authoritative exposition of that law is to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Herman v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Ettlinger v. Trustees of Randolph-Macon CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Phillips v. Buffalo General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Hamburger v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Sessions v. Thomas D. Dee Memorial Hospital Ass'n.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953