Legal Opinion
United States v. Acosta
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 3, 2000No. 2:98-cv-00104PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANT ROSADO’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE RECOVERED DURING SEARCH OF 5643 NORTH 36TH STREET
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Defendant Rosado seeks an order suppressing evidence seized during a June 22, 1998 search of his residence on Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment grounds. Officers initially made a consensual “protective sweep” to look for persons on the premises. They then used information gleaned during this search to support an affidavit, pursuant to which a search warrant was issued. Rosado contends that the protective sweep was nonconsensual, and further contends that…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GoodmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- United States v. PerezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- State v. HerbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- United States v. KunenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. OLAJUWAN HERBERT (12-11-2693, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.