Legal Opinion

Engweiler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 12, 2005No. A108469PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Petitioner is in prison serving a life sentence for an aggravated murder that he committed in 1990. Because he was under 17 years old when he committed the crime, he was not subject either to a sentence of “true life” — i.e., life imprisonment without eligibility for parole — or to a mandatory minimum sentence. Petitioner’s life sentence, therefore, permits him to be paroled at any time, pursuant to the authority of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board). In 1999, the board held what is called a “prison term hearing” for petitioner and established for him a “prison term” of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Quintero v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. EngweilerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Engweiler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Engweiler v. PerssonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. FeltonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Engweiler v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sopher v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API