Legal Opinion

Forrest v. Royal Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1927No. Docket No. 3241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEYAND, J., pro tem.

Appellant 0. II. Spurlock on or about October 16, 1923, insured his automobile with the Royal Insurance Company, which said company is also an appellant herein. This insurance was secured by said Spurlock through one Augustine N. Trainor, who was at said time acting as agent of said company at Fairfield, Solano County, California. While this insurance was in force and effect the car of Spurlock was stolen from Spurlock and the same was thereafter found in Oakland, California, in a condition. Appellant Spurlock reported the theft of the machine to the agent Trainor, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lancashire Ins. Co. of Manchester v. BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. McGowan v. Burg Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mullanix v. BasichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API