Legal Opinion

B & P CPNCRETE, INC. v. Turnbow

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 27, 1977No. 1 CA-CIV 3039PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PROEB, Chief Judge.

This suit was brought by B & P Concrete, Inc., an Arizona corporation (referred to as B & P) to recover an unpaid balance due from a construction job. The trial court dismissed the action following a motion for summary judgment on the ground that B & P was not a duly licensed contractor and was barred from suit by reason of A.R.S. § 32-1153.

The complaint of B & P alleges, in substance, that in March, 1972, Appellees Hutcheson and Richards owned certain Phoenix property and signed an agreement with Appellee Jack Turnbow for the construction of certain buildings. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Northen v. ElledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sierra Madre Development, Inc. v. via Entrada Townhouses Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. McCormick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Miller v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Department of Revenue & Taxation v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. EVENCHIC v. State Farm Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. City of Flagstaff v. BleekerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API