B & P CPNCRETE, INC. v. Turnbow
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PROEB, Chief Judge.
This suit was brought by B & P Concrete, Inc., an Arizona corporation (referred to as B & P) to recover an unpaid balance due from a construction job. The trial court dismissed the action following a motion for summary judgment on the ground that B & P was not a duly licensed contractor and was barred from suit by reason of A.R.S. § 32-1153.
The complaint of B & P alleges, in substance, that in March, 1972, Appellees Hutcheson and Richards owned certain Phoenix property and signed an agreement with Appellee Jack Turnbow for the construction of certain buildings. In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Northen v. ElledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Sierra Madre Development, Inc. v. via Entrada Townhouses Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- McCormick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Miller v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Department of Revenue & Taxation v. IrvineWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- EVENCHIC v. State Farm Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- City of Flagstaff v. BleekerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.