Legal Opinion
Shane v. Buck
District Court, D. Utah
Decided June 28, 1985No. Civ. C-84-0780WPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WINDER, District Judge.
Oral argument was heard on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on April 18, 1985. Martin Seymour Blaustein appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Shane and Dillon. Peter Stirba appeared on behalf of defendants Buck and the United States Postal Service (“Postal Service”). Both parties submitted memoranda which the court has considered carefully along with various authorities cited therein. Now being fully advised, the court renders the following decision and order.
This case raises four challenges to a Postal Service regulation contained…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- E.F. Hutton Group, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Michael Shane and Joseph Dillon v. Howard L. Buck and United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987