State v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POHLMAN, Judge:
¶1 Timothy Noble Walker asserts that he was denied his federal constitutional right to a jury trial with respect to a key element of the State’s case. We agree and therefore vacate his conviction and remand for a new trial.
BACKGROUND 1
¶2 Walker and his wife (Wife) had been married less than a month when Wife’s employer transferred her job from South Carolina to Utah. The couple then moved to Utah, bringing Wife’s teenage son (Son) with them. They stayed in hotels for a few days while Wife began work at her new location.
¶3 One evening the three were together in their…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BruunCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019