Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 6, 2017No. 20150317-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POHLMAN, Judge:

¶1 Timothy Noble Walker asserts that he was denied his federal constitutional right to a jury trial with respect to a key element of the State’s case. We agree and therefore vacate his conviction and remand for a new trial.

BACKGROUND 1

¶2 Walker and his wife (Wife) had been married less than a month when Wife’s employer transferred her job from South Carolina to Utah. The couple then moved to Utah, bringing Wife’s teenage son (Son) with them. They stayed in hotels for a few days while Wife began work at her new location.

¶3 One evening the three were together in their…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BruunCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  2. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API