Legal Opinion

Myers v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1960No. 4954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law and fact from a judgment entered in the Common Pleas Court of Summit County, Ohio. The action seeks to enjoin the claimed violation of a covenant running with the land, and, by a mandatory order, to require the removal of a certain construction built in claimed violation of the restriction. No question is raised as to the validity of the covenants as prepared, recorded and made a part of the restrictions in the allotment, known as the Searlhurst Allotment, Cuyahoga Palls, Ohio.

George R. Myers and his wife are the owners of a lot adjoining the house and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Romig v. ModestOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Goulding v. PhinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Szilvasy v. SaviersOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winfrey v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. McDonald v. Emporia-Lyon County Joint Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985
  3. McDonald v. EMPORIA-LYON CTY JT. BD., ZONING APPCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API