Legal Opinion

Turner v. Argo Group

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 15, 2023No. 3:23-cv-03542Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TERRANCE TURNER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03542-TSH 8 Plaintiffs, SECOND SCREENING ORDER 9 v. 10 ARGO GROUP, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Terrance Turner, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint and application to proceed 16 in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. On July 24, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to 17 proceed in forma pauperis and screened the complaint, finding it deficient under

28 U.S.C. § 18

1915(e). ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has now filed a Second Amended Complaint.1 ECF…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Fitzpatrick v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API