Legal Opinion
Wingard v. Little
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided September 26, 2003No. 2020702PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing Ex Mero Motu
THOMPSON, Judge.
The opinion of August 8, 2003, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor:
James R. Little and Tana Little (“the plaintiffs”) sued George Herbert Wingard in the Pike Circuit Court (“the trial court”) seeking damages on claims of detinue and breach of contract and seeking a declaratory judgment. In their complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that Wingard had retained possession of a mobile home that belonged to them.
The record before this court is meager and contains only the few pleadings and documents designated by Wingard for inclusion in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Company v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte First Family Financial ServicesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Ex Parte Jones Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Gilbert v. James Russell Motors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Ex parte VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ex parte Arvest BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016